Response to Fackerell's Article

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10 pages, LaTeX

Scientific paper

E. D. Fackerell claims: 1) that Alley and Yilmaz treatment of parallel slabs in general relativity is wrong because the Yilmaz metric used is not a solution of the field equations of general relativity; 2) he also claims that the correct treatment of the parallel slab problem in general relativity must be based on the so-called Taub metric. We show below that both of Fackerell's claims are false. His first claim is based on his failure to distinguish the matter-free regions and the regions with matter. His second claim is based on his failure to recognize that for the Taub metric the left-hand side, hence also the right-hand side of the field equations, are identically zero everywhere. Thus no material systems can be treated via the Taub metric.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Response to Fackerell's Article does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response to Fackerell's Article, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response to Fackerell's Article will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-674083

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.