Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2005-12-20
Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.369:1725-1734,2006
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
10 pages, 15 figures included. Updated to match MNRAS accepted version
Scientific paper
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10427.x
A key science goal of upcoming dark energy surveys is to seek time evolution of the dark energy. This problem is one of {\em model selection}, where the aim is to differentiate between cosmological models with different numbers of parameters. However, the power of these surveys is traditionally assessed by estimating their ability to constrain parameters, which is a different statistical problem. In this paper we use Bayesian model selection techniques, specifically forecasting of the Bayes factors, to compare the abilities of different proposed surveys in discovering dark energy evolution. We consider six experiments -- supernova luminosity measurements by the Supernova Legacy Survey, SNAP, JEDI, and ALPACA, and baryon acoustic oscillation measurements by WFMOS and JEDI -- and use Bayes factor plots to compare their statistical constraining power. The concept of Bayes factor forecasting has much broader applicability than dark energy surveys.
Corasaniti Pier Stefano
Kunz Martin
Liddle Andrew R.
Mukherjee Pia
Parkinson David
No associations
LandOfFree
Model selection as a science driver for dark energy surveys does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Model selection as a science driver for dark energy surveys, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Model selection as a science driver for dark energy surveys will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-661151