Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2011-06-27
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
8 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Scientific paper
Detection thresholds in polarized intensity and polarization bias correction are investigated for surveys where the polarization information is obtained from RM synthesis. Considering unresolved sources with a single rotation measure, a detection threshold of $8 \sigma_{QU}$ applied to the Faraday spectrum will retrieve the RM with a false detection rate less than $10^{-4}$, but polarized intensity is more strongly biased than Ricean statistics suggest. For a detection threshold of $5 \sigma_{QU}$, the false detection rate increases to ~4%, depending also on $\lambda^2$ coverage and the extent of the Faraday spectrum. Non-Gaussian noise in Stokes Q and U due to imperfect imaging and calibration can be represented by a distribution that is the sum of a Gaussian and an exponential. The non-Gaussian wings of the noise distribution increase the false detection rate in polarized intensity by orders of magnitude. Monte-Carlo simulations assuming non-Gaussian noise in Q and U, give false detection rates at $8 \sigma_{QU}$ similar to Ricean false detection rates at $4.9 \sigma_{QU}$.
George Samuel J.
Keller Ben W.
Stil Jeroen M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Detection Thresholds and Bias Correction in Polarized Intensity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Detection Thresholds and Bias Correction in Polarized Intensity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Detection Thresholds and Bias Correction in Polarized Intensity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-638286