Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2000-12-06
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
19 pages, 4 figures, AASLaTeX, accepted by ApJ
Scientific paper
10.1086/320091
The mass of the central black hole in many active galactic nuclei has been estimated on the basis of the assumption that the dynamics of the broad emission line gas are dominated by the gravity of the black hole. The most commonly-employed method is to estimate a characteristic size-scale $r_*$ from reverberation mapping experiments and combine it with a characteristic velocity $v_*$ taken from the line profiles; the inferred mass is then estimated by $r_* v_*^2/G$. We critically discuss the evidence supporting the assumption of gravitational dynamics and find that the arguments are still inconclusive. We then explore the range of possible systematic error if the assumption of gravitational dynamics is granted. Inclination relative to a flattened system may cause a systematic underestimate of the central mass by a factor $\sim (h/r)^2$, where $h/r$ is the aspect ratio of the flattening. The coupled effects of a broad radial emissivity distribution, an unknown angular radiation pattern of line emission, and sub-optimal sampling in the reverberation experiment can cause additional systematic errors as large as a factor of 3 or more in either direction.
No associations
LandOfFree
Systematic Errors in the Estimation of Black Hole Masses by Reverberation Mapping does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Systematic Errors in the Estimation of Black Hole Masses by Reverberation Mapping, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systematic Errors in the Estimation of Black Hole Masses by Reverberation Mapping will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-632354