Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2008-08-29
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
7 pages, 3 Figures; accepted by MNRAS; Reference added;
Scientific paper
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13903.x
We have made a new compilation of observations of maximum stellar mass versus cluster membership number from the literature, which we analyse for consistency with the predictions of a simple random drawing hypothesis for stellar mass selection in clusters. Previously, Weidner and Kroupa have suggested that the maximum stellar mass is lower, in low mass clusters, than would be expected on the basis of random drawing, and have pointed out that this could have important implications for steepening the integrated initial mass function of the Galaxy (the IGIMF) at high masses. Our compilation demonstrates how the observed distribution in the plane of maximum stellar mass versus membership number is affected by the method of target selection; in particular, rather low n clusters with large maximum stellar masses are abundant in observational datasets that specifically seek clusters in the environs of high mass stars. Although we do not consider our compilation to be either complete or unbiased, we discuss the method by which such data should be statistically analysed. Our very provisional conclusion is that the data is not indicating any striking deviation from the expectations of random drawing.
Clarke Catherine J.
Maschberger Th.
No associations
LandOfFree
Maximum stellar mass versus cluster membership number revisited does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Maximum stellar mass versus cluster membership number revisited, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Maximum stellar mass versus cluster membership number revisited will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-543424