Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2004-07-19
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
5 pages, 4 figures, in press at MNRAS. Revised version with new data and discussion
Scientific paper
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08521.x
In response to criticism by Momany et al. (2004), that the recently-identified Canis Major (CMa) overdensity could be simply explained by the Galactic warp, we present proof of the existence of a stellar population in the direction of CMa that cannot be explained by known Galactic components. By analyzing the radial distribution of counts of M-giant stars in this direction, we show that the Momany et al. (2004) warp model overestimates the number of stars in the Northern hemisphere, hence hiding the CMa feature in the South. The use of a better model of the warp has little influence on the morphology of the overdensity and clearly displays an excess of stars grouped at a distance of D=7.2\pm 0.3 kpc. To lend further support to the existence of a population that does not belong to the Galactic disc, we present radial velocities of M-giant stars in the centre of the CMa structure that were obtained with the 2dF spectrograph at the AAT. The extra population shows a radial velocity of vr=109\pm4 km/s, which is significantly higher than the typical velocity of the disc at the distance of CMa. This population also has a low dispersion (13\pm4 km/s). The Canis Major overdensity is therefore highly unlikely to be due to the Galactic warp, adding weight to the hypothesis that we are observing a disrupting dwarf galaxy or its remnants. This leads to questions on what part of CMa was previously identified as the Warp and how to possibly disentangle the two structures.
Bellazzini Michele
Conn Blair C.
Ibata Rodrigo A.
Irwin Mary Jane
Lewis Geraint F.
No associations
LandOfFree
Why the Canis Major overdensity is not due to the Warp: analysis of its radial profile and velocities does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Why the Canis Major overdensity is not due to the Warp: analysis of its radial profile and velocities, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why the Canis Major overdensity is not due to the Warp: analysis of its radial profile and velocities will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-535365