Comments on the Tetrad (Vielbeins)

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, no Figure

Scientific paper

10.1142/S0217732309031739

We want to correct the misunderstandings on the tetrad (or veilbeins in general) appeared in many text books or review articles. The tetrad should be defined without any condition. $e_{\mu a}=\partial_\mu X_a$ with local Lorentz coordinates $X_a$ ia wrong in many sences: it gives the condition $\partial_\mu e_{\nu a}=\partial_\nu e_{\mu a}$, which leads us to the trivial result that the cyclic coefficients vanish identically and to the null Riemannian tensor. Also $e_{\mu a}e_\nu^a=g_{\mu\nu}$ is not scalar under the local Lorentz transformation etc. We show how these deficits are remedied by the correct definition, $e_{\mu a}=D_\mu Z_a$ with local (Anti) de Sitter coordinates $Z_A$.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comments on the Tetrad (Vielbeins) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comments on the Tetrad (Vielbeins), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comments on the Tetrad (Vielbeins) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-526839

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.