Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2005-07-27
Astrophys.J.652:1436-1450,2006
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
39 pages, 12 figures, to appear in ApJ, shorter version, new Fig. 12
Scientific paper
10.1086/508443
A toy model is analyzed in order to evaluate the linear stability of the gain region immediately behind a stalled accretion shock, after core bounce. This model demonstrates that a negative entropy gradient is not sufficient to warrant linear instability. The stability criterion is governed by the ratio \chi of the advection time through the gain region divided by the local timescale of buoyancy. The gain region is linearly stable if \chi< 3. The classical convective instability is recovered in the limit \chi\gg 3. For \chi>3, perturbations are unstable in a limited range of horizontal wavelengths centered around twice the vertical size H of the gain region. The threshold horizontal wavenumbers k_{min} and k_{max} follow simple scaling laws such that Hk_{min}\propto 1/{\chi} and Hk_{max}\propto \chi. The convective stability of the l=1 mode in spherical accretion is discussed, in relation with the asymmetric explosion of core collapse supernovae. The advective stabilization of long wavelength perturbations weakens the possible influence of convection alone on a global l=1 mode.
Foglizzo Thierry
Janka H.-Th.
Scheck Leonhard
No associations
LandOfFree
Neutrino-driven convection versus advection in core collapse supernovae does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Neutrino-driven convection versus advection in core collapse supernovae, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Neutrino-driven convection versus advection in core collapse supernovae will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-494304