Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2010-10-27
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
16 pages, accepted for publication in ApJ
Scientific paper
'Empirical' models (pressure vs. density) of Uranus and Neptune interiors constrained by the gravitational coefficients J_2, J_4, the planetary radii and masses, and Voyager solid-body rotation periods are presented. The empirical pressure-density profiles are then interpreted in terms of physical equations of state of hydrogen, helium, ice (H_2O), and rock (SiO_2) to test the physical plausibility of the models. The compositions of Uranus and Neptune are found to be similar with somewhat different distributions of the high-Z material. The big difference between the two planets is that Neptune requires a non-solar envelope while Uranus is best matched with a solar composition envelope. Our analysis suggests that the heavier elements in both Uranus' and Neptune's interior might increase gradually towards the planetary centers. Indeed it is possible to fit the gravitational moments without sharp compositional transitions.
Anderson John D.
Helled Ravit
Podolak Morris
Schubert Gerald
No associations
LandOfFree
Interior Models of Uranus and Neptune does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Interior Models of Uranus and Neptune, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interior Models of Uranus and Neptune will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-484417