Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1999-02-11
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
10 pages & 6 figures, uses epsf.sty. Accepted for publication in A&A
Scientific paper
The two most common mass estimators that use velocity dispersions and positions of objects in a stellar system, the virial mass estimator (VME) and the projected mass estimator (PME), are revisited and tested using N-body experiments. We consider here only spherical, isolated, and isotropic velocity dispersion systems. We have found that the PME can overestimate masses by ~ 20%, for realistic cluster mass profiles, if applied only to regions around the total system's "effective" radius. The VME can yield a correct mass at different radii provided that the total potential energy term is correctly taken into account and the system is completely sampled; otherwise, it may lead to similar errors as the PME. A surface pressure (3PV) term recently alluded to be usually neglected when using the VME and therefore required as a correction term is here found not necessarily required, although it can be used to yield a reasonable correction term. The preferred method here, however, is the virial theorem due to its simplicity and better agreement with N-body experiments. The possible reasons for the mass discrepancies found when using the PME and the VME in some N-body simulations are also briefly discussed.
Aceves Hector
Perea Jaime
No associations
LandOfFree
On two mass estimators for clusters of galaxies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On two mass estimators for clusters of galaxies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On two mass estimators for clusters of galaxies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-461209