Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

ApJ submittal. 28 pages in uuencoded, compressed postscript (self-unpacking on Unix, with "csh nkp.ps.Z.uu"). 22 compressed po

Scientific paper

We present techniques for identifying and analyzing galaxy groups and show that they provide a powerful discriminator between cosmological models. We apply these to high-resolution PM N-body simulations of structure formation in CHDM (cold/hot/baryon fractions=.6/.3/.1, b=1.5 (COBE norm) and two CDM models; b=1.5 and b=1.0 (COBE norm). Groups are identified with the Nolthenius (1993) algorithm. We find: (1) Properties of groups are a powerful and robust discriminator between these Gaussian models whose spatial and velocity properties differ on Mpc scales. We test robustness against several methods for assigning luminosity to dark matter halos, for merging CfA1 galaxies, and for breaking up massive over-mergers (2) When allowance is made for the high large scale power P(k) present in the CfA1 data, CHDM at our $\Omnu=0.30$ produces slightly too many groups and groups too high a fraction of the galaxies, while the fraction grouped in CDM is far too low. Lowering $\Omnu$ would appear to produce close agreement with all measures, save one: for all simulations, median group sizes are x1.4-1.7 larger than equivalently selected CfA1 groups. (3) The standard group M/L method gives $\Omega\simeq 0.1$ for CHDM and CfA1, and $\Omega\simeq 0.35$ for CDM. A conspiracy of three effects produce these very low values, and we conclude that low observed $\Omega$'s need not argue for a low $\Omega$ universe. When overmergers are broken up, the median virial- to-DM mass of 3D selected groups is $\sim1$ for all simulations. $M_{DM}>10^{14}\Msun$ groups appear virialized in all simulations. Global velocity biases $b_v$ are similar to previous studies. Within 3D-selected groups, CHDM and CDM b=1.5 show a stronger bias of $b_v=0.7-0.8$, while CDM b=1.0 shows group $b_v$'s $\simeq 1$.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-44434

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.