Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1998-01-28
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
8 pages, 5 eps figures, needs paspconf.sty
Scientific paper
We compare the galaxy evolution models of Bruzual & Charlot (1993) with the faint galaxy count, size and colour data from the Hubble and Herschel Deep Fields (Metcalfe et al 1996). For qo=0.05, we find that models where the SFR increases exponentially out to z>2 are consistent with all of the observational data. For qo=0.5, such models require an extra population of galaxies which are only seen at high redshift and then rapidly fade or disappear. We find that, whatever the cosmology, the redshift of the faint blue galaxies and hence the epoch of galaxy formation is likely to lie at z>2. We find no implied peak in the SFR at z=1 and we suggest that the reasons for this contradiction with the results of Madau et al (1996) include differences in faint galaxy photometry, in the treatment of spiral dust and in the local galaxy count normalisation.
Campos Antonio
Fong Richard
Gardner Jeffrey P.
McCracken Henry Joy
Metcalfe Nigel
No associations
LandOfFree
Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-413299