Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, 5 eps figures, needs paspconf.sty

Scientific paper

We compare the galaxy evolution models of Bruzual & Charlot (1993) with the faint galaxy count, size and colour data from the Hubble and Herschel Deep Fields (Metcalfe et al 1996). For qo=0.05, we find that models where the SFR increases exponentially out to z>2 are consistent with all of the observational data. For qo=0.5, such models require an extra population of galaxies which are only seen at high redshift and then rapidly fade or disappear. We find that, whatever the cosmology, the redshift of the faint blue galaxies and hence the epoch of galaxy formation is likely to lie at z>2. We find no implied peak in the SFR at z=1 and we suggest that the reasons for this contradiction with the results of Madau et al (1996) include differences in faint galaxy photometry, in the treatment of spiral dust and in the local galaxy count normalisation.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Galaxy Counts, Sizes, Colours and Redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-413299

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.