The Anthropic Argument against Infinite Past and the Eddington-Lemaitre Universe

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

7 pages, no figures

Scientific paper

This study in the philosophy of cosmology is a part of an ongoing effort to investigate and reassess the importance of the anthropic (Davies-Tipler) argument against cosmologies containing the past temporal infinity. Obviously, the prime targets of this argument are cosmological models stationary on sufficiently large scale, the classical steady state model of Bondi, Gold and Hoyle being the best example. Here we investigate the extension of application of this argument to infinitely old non-stationary models and discuss additional constraints necessary to be imposed on such models for the edge of the anthropic argument to be preserved. An illustrative counterexample is the classical Eddington-Lemaitre model, in the analysis of which major such constraints are presented. Consequences of such an approach for our understanding of the nature of time are briefly discussed.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The Anthropic Argument against Infinite Past and the Eddington-Lemaitre Universe does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Anthropic Argument against Infinite Past and the Eddington-Lemaitre Universe, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Anthropic Argument against Infinite Past and the Eddington-Lemaitre Universe will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-406631

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.