Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers (ERE2011 proceedings)

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Proccedings of the Spanish Relativity Meeting 2011. 4 pages, 4 figures

Scientific paper

We study the perception of Hawking radiation by different observers outside a black hole. The analysis is done in terms of an effective-temperature function that varies along the trajectory of each observer. The vacuum state of the radiation field is chosen to be non-stationary, so as to mimic the switching-on of Hawking radiation that would appear in a real black hole collapse. We analyse how this vacuum is perceived by observers staying at a fixed radius, by observers coming in free-fall from radial infinity at different times, and by observers in free-fall released from finite radial positions. Results found have a compelling physical interpretation. One main result, at first unexpected, is that in general free-falling observers do perceive particle emission by the black hole when crossing the event horizon. This happens because of a diverging Doppler shift at the event horizon.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers (ERE2011 proceedings) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers (ERE2011 proceedings), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hawking radiation as perceived by different observers (ERE2011 proceedings) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-39069

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.