Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
1999-02-13
Mathematics
Logic
8 pages
Scientific paper
The Wholeness Axioms, proposed by Paul Corazza, axiomatize the existence of an elementary embedding j:V-->V. Formalized by augmenting the usual language of set theory with an additional unary function symbol j to represent the embedding, they avoid the Kunen inconsistency by restricting the base theory ZFC to the usual language of set theory. Thus, under the Wholeness Axioms one cannot appeal to the Replacement Axiom in the language with j as Kunen does in his famous inconsistency proof. Indeed, it is easy to see that the Wholeness Axioms have a consistency strength strictly below the existence of an I_3 cardinal. In this paper, I prove that if the Wholeness Axiom WA_0 is itself consistent, then it is consistent with V=HOD. A consequence of the proof is that the various Wholeness Axioms WA_n are not all equivalent. Furthermore, the theory ZFC+WA_0 is finitely axiomatizable.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Wholeness Axioms and V=HOD does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Wholeness Axioms and V=HOD, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Wholeness Axioms and V=HOD will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-362540