Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2007-10-04
Phys.Rev.D77:023504,2008
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
7 pages, 4 figures. Added comments on the data of Table I (after eq. (2.16)). Corrected a typo on eq. (2.15). The mathematica
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.77.023504
We have compiled a dataset consisting of 22 datapoints at a redshift range (0.15,3.8) which can be used to constrain the linear perturbation growth rate f=\frac{d\ln\delta}{d\ln a}. Five of these data-points constrain directly the growth rate f through either redshift distortions or change of the power spectrum with redshift. The rest of the datapoints constrain f indirectly through the rms mass fluctuation \sigma_8(z) inferred from Ly-\alpha at various redshifts. Our analysis tests the consistency of the LCDM model and leads to a constraint of the Wang-Steinhardt growth index \gamma (defined from f=\Omega_m^\gamma) as \gamma=0.67^{+0.20}_{-0.17}. This result is clearly consistent at $1\sigma$ with the value \gamma={6/11}=0.55 predicted by LCDM. A first order expansion of the index \gamma in redshift space leads to similar results.We also apply our analysis on a new null test of LCDM which is similar to the one recently proposed by Chiba and Nakamura (arXiv:0708.3877) but does not involve derivatives of the expansion rate $H(z)$. This also leads to the fact that LCDM provides an excellent fit to the current linear growth data.
Nesseris Savas
Perivolaropoulos Leandros
No associations
LandOfFree
Testing LCDM with the Growth Function δ(a): Current Constraints does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Testing LCDM with the Growth Function δ(a): Current Constraints, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing LCDM with the Growth Function δ(a): Current Constraints will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-328378