Implications of the Early X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves of Swift GRBs

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

31 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables; submitted to MNRAS

Scientific paper

10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10621.x

According to current models, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced when the energy carried by a relativistic outflow is dissipated and converted into radiation. The efficiency of this process, $\epsilon_\gamma$, is one of the critical factors in any GRB model. The X-ray afterglow light curves of Swift GRBs show an early stage of flat decay. This has been interpreted as reflecting energy injection. When combined with previous estimates, which have concluded that the kinetic energy of the late ($\gtrsim 10$ hr) afterglow is comparable to the energy emitted in gamma-rays, this interpretation implies very high values of $\epsilon_\gamma \gtrsim 0.9$. Such a high efficiency is hard to reconcile with most models, including in particular the popular internal-shocks model. We re-analyze the derivation of the kinetic energy from the afterglow X-ray flux and re-examine the resulting estimates of the efficiency. We confirm that, if the flatt decay arises from energy injection and the pre-Swift broad-band estimates of the kinetic energy are correct, then $\epsilon_\gamma \gtrsim 0.9$. We point out, however, that another interpretation of the flattish decay - a variable X-ray afterglow efficiency (e.g., due to a time dependence of afterglow shock microphysical parameters) - is possible. We also show that direct estimates of the kinetic energy from the late X-ray afterglow flux are sensitive to the assumed values of the shock microphysical parameters and suggest that broad-band afterglow fits might have underestimated the kinetic energy (e.g., by overestimating the fraction of electrons that are accelerated to relativistic energies). Either one of these possibilities implies a lower gamma-ray efficiency, and their joint effect could conceivably reduce the estimate of the typical $\epsilon_\gamma$ to $\sim 0.1-0.5$.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Implications of the Early X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves of Swift GRBs does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Implications of the Early X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves of Swift GRBs, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Implications of the Early X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves of Swift GRBs will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-305671

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.