Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2008-04-17
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
7 pages, minor revision, references added, accepted for publication MNRAS
Scientific paper
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13812.x
The non-Gaussian cold spot found in the WMAP data has created controversy about its origin. Here we calculate the Bayesian posterior probability ratios for three different models that could explain the cold spot. A recent work claimed that the Spot could be caused by a cosmic texture, while other papers suggest that it could be due to the gravitational effect produced by an anomalously large void. Also the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect caused by a cluster is taken into account as a possible origin. We perform a template fitting on a 20 degrees radius patch centered at Galactic coordinates (b = -57circ, l = 209) and calculate the posterior probability ratios for the void and Sunyaev-Zeldovich models, comparing the results to those obtained with textures. Taking realistic priors for the parameters, the texture interpretation is favored, while the void and Sunyaev-Zeldovich hypotheses are discarded. The temperature decrement produced by voids or clusters is negligible considering realistic values for the parameters.
Cruz Miguel
Diego Jose Maria
Hobson Michael
Martinez-Gonzalez Enrique
Turok Neil
No associations
LandOfFree
The CMB cold spot: texture, cluster or void? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The CMB cold spot: texture, cluster or void?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The CMB cold spot: texture, cluster or void? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-303503