Power-laws f(R) theories are cosmologically unacceptable

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 1 figure, title changed

Scientific paper

10.1142/S0218271807010936

In a recent paper [1] (PRL 98,131302,2007) we have shown that f(R)=R + mu R^{n} modified gravity dark energy models are not cosmologically viable because during the matter era that precedes the accelerated stage the cosmic expansion is given by a sim t^{1/2} rather than a sim t^{2/3}, where a is a scale factor and t is the cosmic time. A recent work [2] (PLB 639,135-143,2006) by Capozziello et al. criticised our results presenting some apparent counter-examples to our claim in f(R)= mu R^{n} models. We show here that those particular R^{n} models can produce an expansion as a sim t^{2/3} but this does not connect to a late-time acceleration. Hence, though acceptable f(R) dark energy models may exist, the R^{n} models presented in Capozziello et al. are not cosmologically viable, confirming our previous results in Ref. [1].

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Power-laws f(R) theories are cosmologically unacceptable does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Power-laws f(R) theories are cosmologically unacceptable, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Power-laws f(R) theories are cosmologically unacceptable will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-276450

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.