Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth

Mathematics – Probability

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

24 pages, no figures

Scientific paper

10.1214/EJP.v20-1867

Toral (2002) considered an ensemble of N\geq2 players. In game B a player is randomly selected to play Parrondo's original capital-dependent game. In game A' two players are randomly selected without replacement, and the first transfers one unit of capital to the second. Game A' is fair (with respect to total capital), game B is losing (or fair), and the random mixture {\gamma}A'+(1-{\gamma})B is winning, as was demonstrated by Toral for {\gamma}=1/2 using computer simulation. We prove this, establishing a strong law of large numbers and a central limit theorem for the sequence of profits of the ensemble of players for each {\gamma}\in(0,1). We do the same for the nonrandom pattern of games (A')^r B^s for all integers r,s\geq1. An unexpected relationship between the random-mixture case and the nonrandom-pattern case occurs in the limit as N\rightarrow\infty.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Parrondo's paradox via redistribution of wealth will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-256910

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.