Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2007-09-21
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
submitted to ApJL
Scientific paper
10.1086/525020
We examine the impact of non-Gaussian photometry errors on photometric redshift performance. We find that they greatly increase the scatter, but this can be mitigated to some extent by incorporating the correct noise model into the photometric redshift estimation process. However, the remaining scatter is still equivalent to that of a much shallower survey with Gaussian photometry errors. We also estimate the impact of non-Gaussian errors on the spectroscopic sample size required to verify the photometric redshift rms scatter to a given precision. Even with Gaussian {\it photometry} errors, photometric redshift errors are sufficiently non-Gaussian to require an order of magnitude larger sample than simple Gaussian statistics would indicate. The requirements increase from this baseline if non-Gaussian photometry errors are included. Again the impact can be mitigated by incorporating the correct noise model, but only to the equivalent of a survey with much larger Gaussian photometry errors. However, these requirements may well be overestimates because they are based on a need to know the rms, which is particularly sensitive to tails. Other parametrizations of the distribution may require smaller samples.
Margoniner Vera E.
Riechers P.
Wittman Dave
No associations
LandOfFree
Photometric Redshifts and Photometry Errors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Photometric Redshifts and Photometry Errors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Photometric Redshifts and Photometry Errors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-256101