Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2007-04-04
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4 pages, accepted for A&A Letters
Scientific paper
10.1051/0004-6361:20077250
We compare the mass distribution of central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPN) with those of their progeny, white dwarfs (WD). We use a dynamical method to measure masses with an uncertainty of 0.02 M$_\odot$. The CSPN mass distribution is sharply peaked at $0.61 \rm M_\odot$. The WD distribution peaks at lower masses ($0.58 \rm M_\odot$) and shows a much broader range of masses. Some of the difference can be explained if the early post-AGB evolution is faster than predicted by the Bl\"ocker tracks. Between 30 and 50 per cent of WD may avoid the PN phase because of too low mass. However, the discrepancy cannot be fully resolved and WD mass distributions may have been broadened by observational or model uncertainties.
Gesicki Krzysztof
Zijlstra Albert A.
No associations
LandOfFree
White dwarf masses derived from planetary nebulae modelling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with White dwarf masses derived from planetary nebulae modelling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and White dwarf masses derived from planetary nebulae modelling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-213978