Dust-Induced Systematic Errors in UV-Derived Star Formation Rates

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Conference Proceedings: 4 pages with 3 embedded figures. To appear in 'Galaxy evolution: theory and observations', Eds. V. Avi

Scientific paper

10.1086/342127

Rest-frame far-ultraviolet (FUV) luminosities form the `backbone' of our understanding of star formation at all cosmic epochs. FUV luminosities are typically corrected for dust by assuming that extinction indicators which have been calibrated for local starbursting galaxies apply to all star-forming galaxies. I present evidence that `normal' star-forming galaxies have systematically redder UV/optical colors than starbursting galaxies at a given FUV extinction. This is attributed to differences in star/dust geometry, coupled with a small contribution from older stellar populations. Folding in data for starbursts and ultra-luminous infrared galaxies, I conclude that SF rates from rest-frame UV and optical data alone are subject to large (factors of at least a few) systematic uncertainties because of dust, which cannot be reliably corrected for using only UV/optical diagnostics.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Dust-Induced Systematic Errors in UV-Derived Star Formation Rates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Dust-Induced Systematic Errors in UV-Derived Star Formation Rates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dust-Induced Systematic Errors in UV-Derived Star Formation Rates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-209138

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.