Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1999-08-10
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
To appear in `The Hy-redshift universe: Galaxy formation and evolution at high redshift' eds. A.J. Bunker and W.J.M. van Breug
Scientific paper
We use three samples (3CRR, 6CE and 6C*) to investigate the radio luminosity function (RLF) for the `most powerful' low-frequency selected radio sources. We find that the data are well fitted by a model with a constant co-moving space density at high redshift as well as by one with a declining co-moving space density above some particular redshift. This behaviour is very similar to that inferred for steep-spectrum radio quasars by Willott et al (1998) in line with the expectations of Unified Schemes. We conclude that there is as yet no evidence for a `redshift cut-off' in the co-moving space densities of powerful classical double radio sources, and rule out a cut-off at z < 2.5.
Blundell Katherine M.
Eales Steve
Jarvis Matt J.
Lacy Mark
Rawlings Steve
No associations
LandOfFree
No evidence for a `redshift cut-off' for the most powerful classical double radio sources does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with No evidence for a `redshift cut-off' for the most powerful classical double radio sources, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and No evidence for a `redshift cut-off' for the most powerful classical double radio sources will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-201886