Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Oct 1991
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1991baicz..42..320k&link_type=abstract
Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, Bulletin (ISSN 0004-6248), vol. 42, no. 5, Oct. 1991, p. 320-328.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
1
Astronomical Models, Interplanetary Medium, Magnetohydrodynamic Waves, Semiempirical Equations, Shock Wave Propagation, Boundary Value Problems, Mathematical Models, Shock Wave Profiles, Solar Wind
Scientific paper
A comparison was made between the 2D version of the 2 1/2-D MHD model by Wu et al.(1983) and the semiempirical model of Voros and Karlicky (1988). Although agreement in the exponential dependence (N is about 0.5) of shock wave velocities was found, the compared models differ in the early stages of shock wave propagation and in the shock shapes. A small E-W asymmetry of shock wave propagation was found in the MHD simulations.
Dryer Murray
Karlicky Marian
Smith Zdenka
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of 2-dimensional MHD and semiempirical models of interplanetary shock wave propagation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of 2-dimensional MHD and semiempirical models of interplanetary shock wave propagation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of 2-dimensional MHD and semiempirical models of interplanetary shock wave propagation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1875645