Other
Scientific paper
May 1998
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1998nicm.rept....9s&link_type=abstract
Instrument Science Report NICMOS 98-009, 5 pages
Other
Hubble Space Telescope, Hst, Space Telescope Science Institute, Nicmos
Scientific paper
We report the effects of cyclic OTA length changes (“breathing”) on focus position for a variety of observational strategies. Special attention is given to the case of NICMOS coronagraphic observations of bright targets. These observations are generally made in pairs, with a large (~30°) spacecraft roll between the observations. We find that if the pairs are forced into the same orbit, there is on the average a 1.6 micron secondary motion between the observations. If the pairs are separated by an orbit, however, on average the focus variation is only 0.75 microns. The difference in average focus variation is even larger (a factor of four) if only the focus variation immediately after a spacecraft slew is considered. This result suggests that coronagraphic observations (as well as others very sensitive to focus) should be put in congruent parts of consecutive orbits.
Hershey John L.
Storrs Alex D.
No associations
LandOfFree
Focus Variation and the Orbital Phase of Observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Focus Variation and the Orbital Phase of Observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Focus Variation and the Orbital Phase of Observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1865616