Petrologic comparisons of Cayley and Descartes on the basis of Apollo 16 soils from stations 4 and 11

Details Petrologic comparisons of Cayley and Descartes on the basis of Apollo 16 soils from stations 4 and 11 Petrologic comparisons of Cayley and Descartes on the basis of Apollo 16 soils from stations 4 and 11

Feb 1984

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1984lpsc...14..535b&link_type=abstract

(American Geophysical Union and NASA, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 14th, Houston, TX, Mar. 14-18, 1983) Journal of Ge

Mathematics

Logic

2

Apollo 16 Flight, Highlands, Lithology, Lunar Geology, Lunar Soil, Petrology, Abundance, Breccia, Lunar Rocks, Photomicrographs, Plains, Moon, Samples, Lunar, Petrology, Comparisons, Cayley Plains, Plains, Descartes Mountains, Apollo 16, Station 4, Station 11, Landing Sites, Soils, Modal Analysis, Abundance, Drive Tube Samples, 64001, 67941, Stone Mountain, North Ray, Melts, Rocks, Breccias, Lithology, Source, Origin, Metamorphism, Composition, Mixing, Grains, Size, Distribution

Scientific paper

Petrologic aspects of the Cayley and Descartes formations are reviewed in the light of new data on Apollo 16 soils. Specific comparison of the modal abundances of lithic fragments in drive tube sample 64001/2 from the slopes of Stone Mountain (station 4) and in soil 67941 from the North Ray Crater rim (station 11) shows that melt rocks, especially poikilitic rocks, are more abundant at station 4 than at station 11; the reverse is true for fragmental breccias. Such lithologic differences suggest that stations 4 and 11 do not belong to the same geologic formation. Metamorphosed breccias are pervasive in both the formations and may represent a local component that has been reworked and diluted as fresh materials were added. Lithologic compositions inferred from the study of soil samples are different from lithologic compositions inferred from the study of rake samples or breccia clasts. This difference may be related to a mixing of material of different grain size distributions. The petrology of soils at the Apollo 16 site may not accurately reflect original material associated with either the Descartes or the Cayley formation because of extensive mixing with local material.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Petrologic comparisons of Cayley and Descartes on the basis of Apollo 16 soils from stations 4 and 11 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Petrologic comparisons of Cayley and Descartes on the basis of Apollo 16 soils from stations 4 and 11, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Petrologic comparisons of Cayley and Descartes on the basis of Apollo 16 soils from stations 4 and 11 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1858894