Some Consequences of the Mechanical Forcing of Cores and Oceans (Invited)

Details Some Consequences of the Mechanical Forcing of Cores and Oceans (Invited) Some Consequences of the Mechanical Forcing of Cores and Oceans (Invited)

Dec 2009

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009agufm.p44a..04s&link_type=abstract

American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, abstract #P44A-04

Mathematics

Logic

[5430] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Interiors

Scientific paper

All of the large terrestrial bodies (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Moon, Mars, probably Io) have liquid iron-alloy outer cores and partially solid adjacent silicate mantles, and most large icy bodies (Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Titan, perhaps Triton and Pluto, maybe even some smaller bodies such as Enceladus) also have internal liquid-solid interfaces. I argue that the dynamics for these icy body interfaces can be very different from the terrestrial cases because they are phase transitions. Topography on a phase transition must be dynamically maintained and the redistribution of heat in a fluid region is so efficient that this topography can be rapidly destroyed on geologic timescales. The relatively low viscosity of ice compared to silicates (when both are near their melting points) also tends to counteract substantial topography. I will present scaling arguments for the expected behavior and consequences for the various kinds of coupling across liquid -solid interfaces and how this can affect dynamics and energy budgets. I will illustrate this through three examples: Venus, Moon and Titan. In the case of Venus, the rotational bulge is negligible and core-mantle coupling is expected to be the dominant dissipative process that defines the rate and nature of the True Polar Wander driven by variable mantle convection. It will also modify the length of day variations. Thus, study of Venus from Earth by radar can tell us about the dynamics of the deep interior. In the case of our Moon, I will argue that recent results for lunar paleomagnetism are best explained by a dynamo during an early epoch of large obliquity and possibly large eccentricity. In this case, the near sphericity of the core-mantle boundary allows the core to rotate about a substantially different axis than the mantle, leading to mechanically driven core flows sufficient to maintain a lunar dynamo. In the case of Titan, the evidence for an ocean is in question, but the theoretical arguments are strong, especially in light of what we know about the comparison bodies Ganymede and Callisto. New gravity and topography results are interpreted in the light of the likely presence of this ocean and estimates are offered for the consequent rotational dynamics. The common theme of these three examples is the role that external geodetic observations can have in illuminating internal structure of planets and satellites.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Some Consequences of the Mechanical Forcing of Cores and Oceans (Invited) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Some Consequences of the Mechanical Forcing of Cores and Oceans (Invited), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Some Consequences of the Mechanical Forcing of Cores and Oceans (Invited) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1773059