Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Feb 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006a%26at...25...75b&link_type=abstract
Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions, vol. 25, Issue 1, p.75-94
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Galaxy Clusters, Catalogues, Faint Object Classification And Analysis System (Focas), Source Extractor (Sextractor), Digitized Sky Survey
Scientific paper
In this paper the comparison between the Faint Object Classification and Analysis System (FOCAS) and Source Extractor (SExtractor) packages for automated star galaxy classification is discussed. The analysis presented here uses a data set containing 43 Abell clusters of galaxies obtained from the Digitized Sky Survey. Comparison is based on four image parameters: the magnitude, area, ellipticity and position angle computed for each object. Statistical analysis shows that in the case of individual clusters, in general, there is good correlation between parameters obtained from both packages. The comparison of visual classification with automatic classification from FOCAS shows that the percentage of misclassified galaxies is about 20.
Biernacka Malgorzata
Flin Piotr
Krywult Janusz
No associations
LandOfFree
The application of the Faint Object Classification and Analysis System (FOCAS) and Source Extractor (SExtractor) packages to the Digitized Sky Survey does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The application of the Faint Object Classification and Analysis System (FOCAS) and Source Extractor (SExtractor) packages to the Digitized Sky Survey, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The application of the Faint Object Classification and Analysis System (FOCAS) and Source Extractor (SExtractor) packages to the Digitized Sky Survey will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1766393