Quantitative Comparison of Packages for Galaxy Detection and Photometry

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We compare two popular packages for finding and measuring galaxies in deep fields: FOCAS and SExtractor. These packages perform similar tasks, including galaxy detection at a given isophote defined in terms of sky noise, several kinds of aperture photometry, source splitting, and star-galaxy discrimination. The analysis is of a set of images of 5 arcmin fields showing numerous galaxies with R magnitudes 18 to 23, observed using the KPNO 2.1 m telescope in U, B, V, R, and I bands, in support of a Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) observing program. Results are also compared for STIS wide-band CCD images. Differences between the detections and photometry done using FOCAS and SExtractor are evaluated statistically; for a subset of objects, these results are compared to those of customized analysis using IDL. The photometry of relatively bright, isolated galaxies is robust for almost any reasonable algorithm, whereas the splitting of blends and the photometry of faint sources are more sensitive.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Quantitative Comparison of Packages for Galaxy Detection and Photometry does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Quantitative Comparison of Packages for Galaxy Detection and Photometry, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantitative Comparison of Packages for Galaxy Detection and Photometry will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1744440

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.