Dec 2003
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2003trgeo...1..477t&link_type=abstract
Treatise on Geochemistry, Volume 1. Editor: Andrew M. Davis. Executive Editors: Heinrich D. Holland and Karl K. Turekian. pp. 71
Other
10
Scientific paper
Mercury is an important part of the solar system puzzle, yet we know less about it than any other planet, except Pluto. Mercury is the smallest of the terrestrial planets (0.05 Earth masses) and the closest to the Sun. Its relatively high density (5.4 g cm -3) indicates that it has a large metallic core (˜3/4 of the planet's radius) compared to its silicate mantle and crust. The existence of a magnetic field implies that the metallic core is still partly molten. The surface is heavily cratered like the highlands of the Moon, but some areas are smooth and less cratered, possibly like the lunar maria (but not as dark). Its surface composition, as explained in the next section, appears to be low in FeO (only ˜3 wt.%), which implies that either its crust is anorthositic (Jeanloz et al., 1995) or its mantle is similarly low in FeO ( Robinson and Taylor, 2001).The proximity of Mercury to the Sun is particularly important. In one somewhat outmoded view of how the solar system formed, Mercury was assembled in the hottest region close to the Sun so that virtually all of the iron was in the metallic state, rather than oxidized to FeO (e.g., Lewis, 1972, 1974). If correct, Mercury ought to have relatively a low content of FeO. This hypothesis also predicts that Mercury should have high concentrations of refractory elements, such as calcium, aluminum, and thorium, and low concentrations of volatile elements, such as sodium and potassium, compared to the other terrestrial planets.Alternative hypotheses tell a much more nomadic and dramatic story of Mercury's birth. In one alternative view, wandering planetesimals that might have come from as far away as Mars or the inner asteroid belt accreted to form Mercury (Wetherill, 1994). This model predicts higher FeO and volatile elements than does the high-temperature model, and similar compositions among the terrestrial planets. The accretion process might have been accompanied by a monumental impact that stripped away much of the young planet's rocky mantle, accounting for the high density of the planet ( Benz et al., 1988). Most planetary scientists consider such a giant impact as the most likely hypothesis for the origin of the Moon. A giant impact model could explain the high density of Mercury if much of the silicate material failed to reaccrete, but it would not explain the low FeO concentration of the planet. Thus, knowing the composition of Mercury is crucial to testing models of planetary accretion.In this chapter we summarize what we know about the chemical composition of Mercury, with emphasis on assessing the amount of FeO in the bulk planet. FeO is a particularly useful quantity to evaluate the extent to which Mercury is enriched in refractory elements, because its concentration increases with decreasing temperature in a cooling gas of solar composition (e.g., Goettel, 1988). We then examine models for the composition of Mercury and outline tests that future orbital missions to Mercury will be able to make.
Jeffrey Taylor G.
Scott Edward R. D.
No associations
LandOfFree
Mercury does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Mercury, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mercury will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1732144