Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
May 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002aas...200.3705g&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, 200th AAS Meeting, #37.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 34, p.695
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
Prominence eruptions are thought to be an integral part of coronal mass ejections. However, recent statistical studies obtained conflicting conclusions regarding this relationship: a nearly one-to-one correspondence to a poor association. We revisited this problem using all the eruptive prominences detected automatically from the daily images obtained by the Nobeyama Radioheliograph. The images were made with a 10 min cadence so only slower eruptions could be detected from these images. During January 1996 to December 2001, there were 226 prominence eruptions detected this way and 182 of them had white light observations from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) mission. When we compared the radio and white light data, we found that 76 CMEs, while only 16 remaining 8 suggesting partial eruption. We conclude that there is good association between CMEs when the prominence eruptions have a radial component of the velocity is dominant.
Gopalswamy Nat
Shibasaki Kazuo
Shimojo Miki
Yashiro Seiji
No associations
LandOfFree
Prominence Eruptions and CMEs: A Statistical Study does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Prominence Eruptions and CMEs: A Statistical Study, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Prominence Eruptions and CMEs: A Statistical Study will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1718278