The resurfacing controversy for Venus: an overview and a mechanistic perspective

Details The resurfacing controversy for Venus: an overview and a mechanistic perspective The resurfacing controversy for Venus: an overview and a mechanistic perspective

Mar 1993

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993thtp.reptu....s&link_type=abstract

In MIT, Tectonic History of the Terrestrial Planets 1 p (SEE N94-31105 09-91)

Mathematics

Logic

Convective Heat Transfer, Planetary Craters, Planetary Crusts, Planetary Evolution, Planetary Geology, Tectonics, Venus (Planet), Venus Surface, Volcanoes, Volcanology, Deformation, Heat Flux, Lithosphere, Strain Rate

Scientific paper

Two remarkable aspects of the population of impact craters on Venus are that craters at all sizes are indistinguishable from a random population and that most craters have not been significantly modified by tectonic strain or by volcanic flows external to the crater rim, despite evidence from Magellan images that volcanic and tectonic features are widespread on Venus. One interpretation of these observations is that most of the surface dates from the end of a catastrophic global resurfacing event that ceased about 500 My ago, and that a small fraction of craters volcaniclly embayed or modified by deformation indicate that volcanic and tectonic activity subsequent to that time has been at much lower levels. A competing scenario, in which resurfacing occurs episodically in patches a few hundred kilometers in extent and there is a wider spectrum of surface ages, also appears to be consistent with the characteristics of impact craters on Venus. While geological and statistical studies of the crater population on Venus offer some promise for distinguishing between these two hypotheses, consideration of the possible mechanisms of catastrophic episodic resurfacing provides an independent perspective. Potential mechanisms for catastrophic resurfacing of Venus range from geologically sudden convective destabilization of the global lithosphere to strongly time-dependent heat flux and melt generation in the underlying mantle. For most of these mechanisms, resurfacing occurs implicitly or explicitly by volcanism. An alternative hypothesis is that, at least in the geologically recent history of Venus, the primary resurfacing mechanism has been tectonic deformation rather than volcanism. Because the rate of surface strain should be controlled by the temperature-dependent strength of the lower crust, a geologically rapid transition in surface strain rates should be the natural result of planetary cooling. This transition would occur at comparable times for areas of similar crustal thickness and heat flow, but would be delayed for regions of thicker or hotter crust. The end of the era of high rates of tectonic resurfacing could thus appear as a 'catastrophe' over the 80% of the planet with an elevation within 1 Km of the mean, while continued deformation would give rise to 'episodic' resurfacing to much younger times in the highlands, a result consistent with lower crater densities seen in highland regions.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

The resurfacing controversy for Venus: an overview and a mechanistic perspective does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The resurfacing controversy for Venus: an overview and a mechanistic perspective, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The resurfacing controversy for Venus: an overview and a mechanistic perspective will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1708233