Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Jan 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009aas...21332005h&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #213, #320.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 41, p.375
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
What happens when even Percival Lowell stops believing in your Mars observations?
History can be troubling. This I learned while editing the Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers (Springer, 2007). There have been astronomers who do not fit our commonly held, and clung to, conceptual model: a sociological system that sifts out generally like-minded and sensible colleagues. I refer to those individuals who (for at least a time) successfully entered the mainstream profession, but now disturb our worldview that says prosperity as a scientist usually is achieved by a rational being holding certain common values.
My List of Shame includes examples from each of the last four centuries. Not "crack pot” cosmologists, these were hard-working observers for whom the end justified the means. And they all got away with it.
Each person I discuss was vetted by the professional establishment of the day. Yet you will learn how to be fired from a major observatory, banned from prominent journals. But only after damage to the science is done. Be afraid.
No associations
LandOfFree
Really Bad Astronomers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Really Bad Astronomers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Really Bad Astronomers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1697791