Really Bad Astronomers

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

What happens when even Percival Lowell stops believing in your Mars observations?
History can be troubling. This I learned while editing the Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers (Springer, 2007). There have been astronomers who do not fit our commonly held, and clung to, conceptual model: a sociological system that sifts out generally like-minded and sensible colleagues. I refer to those individuals who (for at least a time) successfully entered the mainstream profession, but now disturb our worldview that says prosperity as a scientist usually is achieved by a rational being holding certain common values.
My List of Shame includes examples from each of the last four centuries. Not "crack pot” cosmologists, these were hard-working observers for whom the end justified the means. And they all got away with it.
Each person I discuss was vetted by the professional establishment of the day. Yet you will learn how to be fired from a major observatory, banned from prominent journals. But only after damage to the science is done. Be afraid.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Really Bad Astronomers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Really Bad Astronomers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Really Bad Astronomers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1697791

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.