Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Sep 1987
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1987acasn..28..345p&link_type=abstract
(Acta Astronomica Sinica, vol. 28, 1987, p. 345-353) Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0275-1062), vol. 12, Sept. 1988, p
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Background Radiation, Gravitational Effects, Relic Radiation, Big Bang Cosmology, Cosmic Dust, Electron Transitions
Scientific paper
Olbers' and Seeliger's paradoxes, two main arguments for the finite world model, are discussed, focusing on the use of cosmic background radiation as evidence for big bang theory. It is suggested that the premises of these paradoxes are wrong, and that cosmic background radiation originates from cosmic dust. It is found that, in Seeliger's paradox, the assumption that the universal gravitation effect is instantaneous is wrong. In Olber's paradox, the assumption that the light of stars is not absorbed by stars or by cosmic dust is also found to be incorrect. It is shown that, according to the condition of dynamic equilibrium of cosmic dust, the temperature of cosmic dust can be calculated to be about 2.9-3.1 K, which is in agreement with the observed temperature of cosmic background radiation.
No associations
LandOfFree
New insight into Olbers' and Seeliger's paradoxes and the cosmic background radiation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with New insight into Olbers' and Seeliger's paradoxes and the cosmic background radiation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and New insight into Olbers' and Seeliger's paradoxes and the cosmic background radiation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1668866