Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
May 1985
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1985gregr..17..499t&link_type=abstract
General Relativity and Gravitation (ISSN 0001-7701), vol. 17, May 1985, p. 499-507.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
5
Cosmology, Relativity, Singularity (Mathematics), Space-Time Functions, Black Holes (Astronomy), Curvature, Geodesic Lines, Schwarzschild Metric, Theorems
Scientific paper
A number of recent theorems by Krolak (1983) and Newman (1983) purport to prove cosmic censorship by showing that strong-curvature singularities must be hidden behind horizons. It is shown that the 'null strong-curvature' condition which Newman imposes on certain classes of null geodesics to restrict curvature growth in the space-time does not hold in many physically realistic space-times: it is not satisfied by any null geodesic in the relevant class in any open Friedmann cosmological model, nor does it hold for any null geodesic in the relevant class in maximal Schwarzschild space. More generally it is argued that the singularity predicted by the Penrose singularity theorem is unlikely to be of the type eliminated by Newman. Thus the Newman theorems are probably without physical significance. The Krolak theorems, although based on a physically significant definition of strong curvature singularity, are mathematically invalid, and this approach cannot be used to obtain a cosmic-censorship theorem.
No associations
LandOfFree
Note on cosmic censorship does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Note on cosmic censorship, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Note on cosmic censorship will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1632107