Infrared giants vs. supergiants. II. CO observations

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

20

Molecular Processes, Stars: Circumstellar Matter, Stars: Mass Loss, Stars: Supergiants, Radio Lines: Stars

Scientific paper

We report systematic observations of millimeter CO emission from a sample of 109 oxygen-rich evolved stars (AGB and supergiants), colour-selected from the IRAS Point Source Catalog (0.69 < S_{25microns }/S_{12microns } < 1.20). CO(1-0) has been searched with good sensitivity in 81 sources (74% of the sample). CO(1-0) is detected in 54 sources and a significant upper limit has been achieved in 27 sources. In our previous paper we reported on the statistical results of these observations. We showed that in almost 50% of the sources, the ratio of the IRAS 60;microns flux to CO intensity, {cal R} = S60/T_mb(1-0), is larger by a factor of 3 to more than 10 than what is expected according to the correlation found by \cite[Nyman et al. (1992)]{nym92}. Supergiants only exhibit very high values (raise 0.6exhbox {> 200). In most cases, the observed spread in the values of this ratio can be explained by a large range of luminosities. This leads to a new criterion to identify AGB stars: an object with {cal R} < 150 must have a low mass progenitor. Here we study the correlations between {cal R} and various physical properties of the sources. Most sources with high values of {cal R} also have low galactic latitudes, small IRAS variability indices, and early spectral types (typically M1-M5). Conversely, there is no dependence on the IRAS colours, nor on the intensity of silicate 10;microns emission. However, a few AGB stars exhibit large {cal R}; other factors than luminosity are required to explain these values. Different hypotheses, such as the possible presence of a chromosphere, a low (12) C abundance or a variable mass-loss rate, are examined. Considering the global high OH detection rate ( ~ 67%), we studied the correlations with CO and OH emission. The detection of OH seems to be a useful discriminator of mechanisms that enhance {cal R}.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Infrared giants vs. supergiants. II. CO observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Infrared giants vs. supergiants. II. CO observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Infrared giants vs. supergiants. II. CO observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1601731

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.