Are γ-ray bursts better star formation tracers than supernovae?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2

Γ-Ray Bursts, Galaxy Evolution, Star Formation History

Scientific paper

Since the breakthrough operated in 1997 by the Beppo-SAX satellite and the subsequent opening of the ``afterglow'' era, it has been widely claimed that the cosmological long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) may represent an ideal tool to probe the global history of star formation in our Universe. GRBs, which are likely detectable up to very high redshifts and do not suffer from dust extinction, seem indeed to originate from the death of short-lived massive stars, and may thus trace the distant star-forming activity without the usual biases inherent to the deep survey approach.
However, the currently known sample of galaxies hosting the GRBs does not seem to be accurately representative of the whole ensemble of high redshift star-forming galaxies. I discuss various reasons to explain such an issue, and describe the perspectives for future work in this subject.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Are γ-ray bursts better star formation tracers than supernovae? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Are γ-ray bursts better star formation tracers than supernovae?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Are γ-ray bursts better star formation tracers than supernovae? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1552285

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.