Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jun 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994pasp..106..553k&link_type=abstract
Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Publications (ISSN 0004-6280), vol. 106, no. 700, p. 553-565
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
361
Abundance, Chemical Evolution, Giant Stars, Globular Clusters, Main Sequence Stars, Stellar Evolution, Variations, Aluminum, Carbon, Dredging, Metallicity, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Sodium, Stellar Composition, Stellar Rotation, Stellar Spectra
Scientific paper
Contrary to historical expectation, stars within a given globular cluster often exhibit wide variations in the abundance of C, N, and O as well as certain light metals, particularly Na and Al. Owing to flux limitations, studies have been confined to evolved stars, especially giants, but in few instances variations have been detected among main-sequence stars. Among giants, the variations are of two kinds. The abundances of C and N are often anticorrelated, and in the limited number of cases in which both have been measured, O and N abundances have also often proved to be anticorrelated (Pilachowski 1988; Sneden et al. 1991; Brown et al. 1991; Kraft et al. 1992). Following pioneering work by Cohen (1978) and Peterson (1980), strong evidence has recently emerged for the existence of a significant global anticorrelation between O and Na abundances (Drake et al. 1992, Kraft et al. 1993). The observations are discussed in terms of contrasting hypotheses: evolutionary versus primordial. In the former, the variations are attributed to the dredgeup of material that has been processed through the CNO cycle in the globular-cluster stars themselves. In the latter, the variations are attributed to primordial chemical inhomogeneities in the material out of which the cluster stars were formed, the composition of these 'clumps' having been determined by nuclear processing in a prior generation of more massive stars. Observational evidence supporting each of these scenarios is cited. Recent studies of stellar rotation among horizontal branch stars in certain clusters (Peterson et al. 1994) as well as new calculations of Na-23 and Al-27 production in the CNO processing regions of evolving low-mass giants (Langer et al. 1993) lend fresh support to the evolutionary hypothesis. However, such calculations do not explain the variation of C and N abundances found among cluster main-sequence stars (Suntzeff 1989; Briley et al. 1991) which therefore seem explicable only on the basis of a primordial scenario. Among mildly metal-poor giants, i.e., those in the range from solar metallicity to (Fe/H) approximately -1, recent observational evidence suggesting the existence of a substructure in the (el/Fe) ratios of the heavier alpha elements, e.g., Si, Mg, Ca, and Ti, is discussed. The possible influence of this effect on the interpretation of the integrated spectra of extragalactic globular clusters and E galaxies is noted.
No associations
LandOfFree
Abundance differences among globular-cluster giants: Primordial versus evolutionary scenarios does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Abundance differences among globular-cluster giants: Primordial versus evolutionary scenarios, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Abundance differences among globular-cluster giants: Primordial versus evolutionary scenarios will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1507178