Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Mar 2012
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2012aps..apr.r7004m&link_type=abstract
American Physical Society, APS April Meeting 2012, March 31-Apr 3, 2012, abstract #R7.004
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
The measurement of astrophysical parameters of coalescing binaries, encoded in their gravitational-wave signature, is a crucial step for enabling gravitational-wave astronomy. However, our ability to make such measurements may be jeopardized by unknown systematic uncertainties in the waveform templates used for parameter estimation. I express my personal views on what waveform features are most crucial to maximize the astrophysical potential of advanced ground-based gravitational-wave detectors. I also discuss ongoing work on determining whether one particular source -- neutron-star binaries -- may be largely immune to systematic waveform uncertainties.
No associations
LandOfFree
What Waveforms do Data Analysts Want?, or the dangers of systematic errors in parameter estimation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with What Waveforms do Data Analysts Want?, or the dangers of systematic errors in parameter estimation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What Waveforms do Data Analysts Want?, or the dangers of systematic errors in parameter estimation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1367323