Particle vs. future event horizon in interacting holographic dark energy model

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

12 pages, 2 figures, references added, abstract changed, typos corrected. To be published in JCAP

Scientific paper

10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/026

By choosing the future event horizon as the horizon of the flat FLRW universe, we show that although the interacting holographic dark energy model is able to explain the phantom divide line crossing, but the thermodynamics second law is not respected in this model. We show that if one takes the particle event horizon as the horizon of the universe, besides describing $\omega=-1$ crossing in a consistent way with thermodynamics second law, he is able to determine appropriately the ratio of dark matter to dark energy density at transition time. In this approach, after the first transition from quintessence to phantom, there is another transition from phantom to quintessence phase which avoids the big rip singularity.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Particle vs. future event horizon in interacting holographic dark energy model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Particle vs. future event horizon in interacting holographic dark energy model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Particle vs. future event horizon in interacting holographic dark energy model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-122115

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.