Reassessing the uranium decay constants for geochronology using ID-TIMS U Pb data

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

47

Scientific paper

As the internal precision of radiometric dates approaches the 0.1% level, systematic biases between different methods have become apparent. Many workers have suggested that calibrating other decay constants against the U Pb system is a viable solution to this problem. We test this assertion empirically and quantitatively by analyzing U Pb systematics of zircon and xenotime on the single- to sub-grain scale by high-precision ID-TIMS geochronology on 11 rock samples ranging from 0.1 to 3.3 Ga. Large statistically equivalent datasets give 207Pb/206Pb dates that are systematically older than 206Pb/238U dates by ˜0.15% in Precambrian samples to as much as ˜3.3% in Mesozoic samples, suggesting inaccuracies in the mean values of one or both of the U decay constants. These data are used to calculate a ratio of the U decay constants that is lower than the accepted ratio by 0.09% and is a factor of 5 more precise. Four of the samples are used to augment existing data from which the U Pb and 40Ar/39Ar systems can be compared. The new data support most previous observations that U Pb and 207Pb/206Pb dates are older than 40Ar/39Ar by ⩽1%, though scatter in the amount of offset in samples as a function of age suggests that the bias is not entirely systematic, and may incorporate interlaboratory biases and/or geologic complexities. Studies that calibrate other decay schemes against U Pb should include an assessment of inaccuracies in the U decay constants in addition to other systematic biases and non-systematic geologic uncertainty.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reassessing the uranium decay constants for geochronology using ID-TIMS U Pb data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reassessing the uranium decay constants for geochronology using ID-TIMS U Pb data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reassessing the uranium decay constants for geochronology using ID-TIMS U Pb data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1210323

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.