Other
Scientific paper
Apr 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001aps..aprs14002k&link_type=abstract
American Physical Society, April Meeting, April 28 - May 1, 2001 Washington, DC Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Vol.
Other
Scientific paper
A small amount of the refractional effect of the bending of light or radio waves, from stars near the Sun's disc, has been given to be a proof of General Relativity. However, recently the Sun's corona has been found to have a temperature many magnitudes greater than originally thought, and to be composed of a much more active, dynamic, material. This should certainly be looked at as the total cause of any star light and radio waves bending near the Sun. It should not be looked at as a proof of General Relativity. The procession of the Mercury perihelion is caused by nuclear electromagnetic gravity ("Nuclear Quantum Gravitation"). It is the electromagnetic, nuclear and nuclear domains gravitational field from the Sun's slow rotation which causes this effect with Mercury, and again, is not a proof of, nor does it have anything to do with General Relativity. Additionally, Mercury's 59.65 Earth day rotational period is a direct two-thirds ratio; a profound effect which also proves "Nuclear Quantum Gravitation". Other so called General Relativity proofs should also be looked at as they have natural scientific and Quantum explanations.
No associations
LandOfFree
General Relativity's "Proofs" Need to be Looked at More Closely. does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with General Relativity's "Proofs" Need to be Looked at More Closely., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and General Relativity's "Proofs" Need to be Looked at More Closely. will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1184234