FAST TRACK PAPER: Is 600 Myr long enough for the random palaeogeographic test of the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption?

Details FAST TRACK PAPER: Is 600 Myr long enough for the random palaeogeographic test of the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption? FAST TRACK PAPER: Is 600 Myr long enough for the random palaeogeographic test of the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption?

Aug 2004

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004geoji.158..443m&link_type=abstract

Geophysical Journal International, Volume 158, Issue 2, pp. 443-445.

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

4

Geocentric Axial Dipole Hypothesis, Palaeomagnetism

Scientific paper

A simple analysis suggests that a time interval of more than about 5000 Myr is needed for the random palaeogeographic test to be effective in assessing the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption. This time is so long as to render the test ineffective. Consequently, intervals of 600 Myr should be recognized as providing only a small sample that is likely to be biased towards low-inclination values.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

FAST TRACK PAPER: Is 600 Myr long enough for the random palaeogeographic test of the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with FAST TRACK PAPER: Is 600 Myr long enough for the random palaeogeographic test of the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and FAST TRACK PAPER: Is 600 Myr long enough for the random palaeogeographic test of the geomagnetic axial dipole assumption? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1174156