Statistics – Computation
Scientific paper
Oct 1997
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1997icar..129..562m&link_type=abstract
Icarus, Volume 129, Issue 2, pp. 562-564.
Statistics
Computation
63
Scientific paper
We use a combination of scaling laws and direct hydrocode computations that include material strength to show that the impact energy needed to disperse an asteroid is greater than that to thoroughly shatter it for asteroids larger than about 400 m in radius. Thus, asteroids larger than this size should probably be considered to be gravitationally bound, but otherwise strengthless, rubble piles.
Melosh Henry Jay
Ryan Eileen V.
No associations
LandOfFree
NOTE: Asteroids: Shattered but Not Dispersed does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with NOTE: Asteroids: Shattered but Not Dispersed, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and NOTE: Asteroids: Shattered but Not Dispersed will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1155014