A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence for Hot Accretion

Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

7

Scientific paper

Although the type-3 to -6 ordinary chondrite recrystallization sequence is attributed to prograde thermal metamorphism by most researchers, various studies have inferred support for the hot-accretion alternative on the basis of the composition and fine structure of pyroxene, the composition and texture of metallic Fe-Ni, misshapen chondrules, the texture of fine-grained silicate matrix material, the depletion of volatile trace elements in chondrite whole rocks, and natural remanent magnetization. Critical assessment of these studies shows that the arguments favoring hot accretion are based largely on inadequate data, flawed experiments, or improbable interpretations. The properties of ordinary chondrites are more readily understood in terms of prograde metamorphism of initially cold, unequilibrated type-3 material and episodes of brecciation, shock heating, and, in some cases, aqueous alteration.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence for Hot Accretion does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence for Hot Accretion, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence for Hot Accretion will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1149116

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.