Other
Scientific paper
Aug 1990
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1990georl..17.1385a&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters (ISSN 0094-8276), vol. 17, Aug. 1990, p. 1385-1388.
Other
14
Erosion, Planetary Craters, Tectonics, Topography, Venus Surface, Altimetry, Astronomical Models, Magellan Project (Nasa), Radar Imagery, Volcanoes
Scientific paper
Crrater production and obliteration are modeled for the plains of Venus, using (1) the observed distribution of Venus-crossing asteroids and comets; (2) viscous relaxation of crater topography; and (3) erosion and burial by atmospheric, volcanic, and tectonic processes. Crater lifetimes are assumed to be proportional to crater depths for both classes of obliterative processes although the individual criteria vary. An average crater retention age between 0.4 to 2.0 Gyr is estimated for plains, under the assumption that craters are produced and not removed. The range is driven by uncertainty in identifying degraded impact as opposed to volcanic craters. On the other hand, crater retention ages greater than about 1.6 Gyr are unlikely if viscous relaxation operates without loading of crater floor by burial. The preferred model has plains subject to crater production and obliteration processes that vary over both space and time.
Arvidson Raymond E.
Grimm Robert E.
Phillips Roger J.
Schaber Gerald G.
Shoemaker Eugene M.
No associations
LandOfFree
On the nature and rate of resurfacing of Venus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the nature and rate of resurfacing of Venus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the nature and rate of resurfacing of Venus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1127407