Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jul 1990
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1990nascp3084..103e&link_type=abstract
In NASA, Ames Research Center, The Interstellar Medium in External Galaxies: Summaries of Contributed Papers p 103-104 (SEE N91-
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Cosmic Dust, Emission, Far Infrared Radiation, Galactic Radiation, Galaxies, H Ii Regions, Infrared Astronomy Satellite, Interstellar Matter, Interstellar Radiation, Molecular Clouds, Radiation Distribution, Atoms, B Stars, Flux Density, Hydrogen, Luminosity, O Stars
Scientific paper
Two of the first Infrared Astronomy Satellite (IRAS) results were that galaxies have a wide range of values for the ratio of 60 micron to 100 micron flux density (0.2 less than or equal to S60/S sub 100 less than or equal to 1.0) and that this ratio is correlated with Lfir, Lb, Lfir being the total far-infrared luminosity and Lb being the luminosity at visible wavelengths (de Jong et al. 1984; Soifer et al. 1984). From these results arose the following simple model for the far-infrared emission from galaxies (de Jong et al. 1984), which has remained the standard model ever since. In this model, the far-infrared emission comes from two dust components: warm dust (T approx. equals 50 K) intermingled with, and heated by, young massive OB stars in molecular clouds and HII regions, and colder dust (T approx. equals 20 K) associated with the diffuse atomic hydrogen in the interstellar medium and heated by the general interstellar radiation field. As the number of young stars in a galaxy increases, S60/S sub 100 increases, because there is a greater proportion of warm dust, and so does Lfir/L sub b, because most of the radiation from the young stars is absorbed by the dust, leading to a swifter increase in far-infrared emission than in visible light. Although this model explains the basic IRAS results, it is inelegant. It uses two free parameters to fit two data (the 60 and 100 micron flux densities)-and there are now several observations that contradict it. Despite these major problems with the two-component model, it is not clear what should be put in its place. When considering possible models for the far-infrared emission from galaxies, the observational evidence for our own galaxy must be considered. Researchers suspect that the study by Boulanger and Perault (1988) of the far-infrared properties of the local interstellar medium may be particularly relevant. They showed that molecular clouds are leaky - that most of the light from OB stars in molecular clouds does not heat the dust in the clouds, but instead leaks out. The consequence of this is that that while most of the far-infrared emission from the solar neighborhood is from dust associated with diffuse HI, this dust is mostly heated by young stars.
Devereux Nicholas A.
Eales Stephen A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Evidence against a simple two-component model for the far-infrared emission from galaxies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Evidence against a simple two-component model for the far-infrared emission from galaxies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Evidence against a simple two-component model for the far-infrared emission from galaxies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1095862