The partitioning behavior of As and Au in S-free and S-bearing magmatic assemblages

Other

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5

Scientific paper

The partitioning of As and Au between rhyolite melt and low-salinity vapor (2 wt% NaCl eq.) in a melt vapor Au metal ± magnetite ± pyrrhotite assemblage has been quantified at 800 °C, 120 MPa and f=NNO. The S-bearing runs have calculated values for the fugacities of H2S, SO2 and S2 of logfS=1.1, logf=-1.5, and logf=-3.0. The ratio of H2S to SO2 is on the order of 400. The experiments constrain the effect of S on the partitioning behavior of As and Au at magmatic conditions. Calculated average Nernst-type partition coefficients (±1σ) for As between vapor and melt, DAsv/m, are 1.0 ± 0.1 and 2.5 ± 0.3 in the S-free and S-bearing assemblages, respectively. These results suggest that sulfur has a small, but statistically meaningful, effect on the mass transfer of As between silicate melt and low-salinity vapor at the experimental conditions. Efficiencies of removal, calculated following Candela and Holland (1986), suggest that the S-free and S-bearing low-salinity vapor can scavenge approximately 41% and 63% As from water-saturated rhyolite melt, respectively, during devolatilization assuming that As is partitioned into magnetite and pyrrhotite during second boiling. The S-free data are consistent with the presence of arsenous acid, As(OH)3 in the vapor phase. However, the S-bearing data suggest the presence of both arsenous acid and a As S complex in S-bearing magmatic vapor. Apparent equilibrium constants, logKAs′(±1σ), describing the partitioning of As between melt and vapor are -1.3 (0.1) and -1.1 (0.1) for the S-free and S-bearing runs, respectively. The increase in the value of KAs′ with the addition of S suggests a role for S in complexing and scavenging As from the melt during degassing. The calculated vapor/melt partition coefficients (±1σ) for Au between vapor and melt, DAuv/m, in S-free and S-bearing assemblages are 15 ± 2.5 and 12 ± 0.3, respectively. Efficiencies of removal (Candela and Holland, 1986) for the S-free melt, calculated assuming that magnetite is the dominant Au-sequestering solid phase during crystallization (Simon et al., 2003), suggest that magmatic vapor may scavenge on the order of 72% Au from a water-saturated melt. Efficiencies of removal calculated for the S-bearing assemblage, assuming pyrrhotite and magnetite are the dominant Au-sequestering solid phases, indicate that vapor may scavenge on the order of 60% Au from the melt. These model calculations suggest that the loss of pyrrhotite and magnetite from a melt, owing to punctuated differentiation during ascent and emplacement, does not prohibit the ability of a rhyolite melt to generate a large-tonnage Au deposit. Apparent equilibrium constants describing the partitioning of Au between melt and vapor were calculated using the mean DAuv/m values for the S-free and S-bearing assemblages; only S-bearing data from runs longer than 400 h were used as shorter runs may not have reached equilibrium with respect only to vapor/melt partitioning of Au. The values for logKAu′(±1σ) are -4.4 (0.1) and -4.2 (0.2) for the S-free and S-bearing runs, respectively. These data suggest that the presence of S does not affect the mass transfer of Au from degassing silicate melt to an exsolved, low-salinity vapor in a low-f assemblage (i.e., pyrrhotite magnetite at NNO) at the experimental conditions reported here. Efficiencies of removal are calculated and used to model the mass transfer of Au from a crystallizing silicate melt to an exsolved, low-salinity vapor phase. The calculations suggest that the model, absolute tonnage of Au scavenged and transported by S-free and S-bearing vapors, from a crystallizing melt, would be comparable and that the time-integrated flux of low-salinity vapor could be responsible for a significant quantity of the Au in magmatic-hydrothermal ore deposits.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The partitioning behavior of As and Au in S-free and S-bearing magmatic assemblages does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The partitioning behavior of As and Au in S-free and S-bearing magmatic assemblages, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The partitioning behavior of As and Au in S-free and S-bearing magmatic assemblages will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1079821

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.