Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Apr 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007cqgra..24.1896.&link_type=abstract
Classical and Quantum Gravity, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp. 1896-1897 (2007).
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
The present volume is an introduction to general relativity and cosmology, at a level suitable for beginning graduate students or advanced undergraduates. The book consists of two main parts, the first entitled `Elements of differential geometry', and the second `The theory of gravitation'.
Chapters 2-7, part I, introduce the basic ideas of differential geometry in a general setting, and are based on previously unpublished notes by one of the authors. On the one hand, the treatment is modern in that it uses a `top-down' approach, i.e. starting with general differentiable manifolds, and deferring the introduction of a metric tensor until after the notions of affine connection and curvature have been introduced. On the other hand, the treatment is classical in that it relies heavily, though not exclusively, on index notation. The general material, chapters 1-7, is then followed by four more specialized chapters dealing with matters of specific interest for general relativity. Topics include symmetry groups acting on Riemannian manifolds, with spherically symmetric spacetimes and spatially homogeneous spacetimes as examples, the efficient calculation of curvature, and the Petrov classification of the Weyl curvature tensor using spinors.
Part II deals with general relativity and cosmology. The basic assumptions of the theory and its application to spherically symmetric gravitational fields are discussed in two chapters, and there is some historical material and motivation for the basic assumptions at the beginning of the book. The final chapter contains a detailed discussion of the Kerr solution. But the main emphasis in part II is on relativistic cosmology, in particular the analysis of cosmological models more general than the familiar Friedmann-Lemaitre (FL) models. The material on cosmology begins with a discussion of relativistic hydrodynamics and thermodynamics. The kinematical quantities (rate of expansion, shear, etc, of a timelike congruence) are introduced and their evolution equations are derived. There follows a description of the fluid model of the Universe and optical observations in such a model, within the framework of a general spacetime geometry. The discussion is subsequently specialized to the Robertson-Walker geometry and the FL models. The rest of part II, two lengthy chapters, deals with two classes of solutions of Einstein's field equations that represent spatially inhomogeneous cosmological models, and that contain the FL models as a special case. The first is the family of Lemaitre-Tolman solutions, whose discovery dates back to the 1930s. They are spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein's field equations with pressure-free matter and a cosmological constant as the matter-energy content. The second class is the family of Szekeres solutions, which can be thought of as generalizations of the Lemaitre-Tolman solutions without any symmetries. Parts of these two chapters are based on Krasinski's book on inhomogeneous cosmologies [4], with the difference that the present work does not attempt to be comprehensive, but instead provides clear derivations of the most important results.
A potential reader may ask how this book differs from other texts on general relativity. It is unique in a number of respects. First is the authors' emphasis on spatially inhomogeneous cosmological models, i.e. models that do not satisfy the cosmological principle. The authors appear to have reservations about the almost universal preference in the cosmological community for working within the framework of the FL models, combined with the inflationary scenario in the very early universe (see in particular, pages 235-6, and sections 17.8-17.10), and these reservations motivate the above emphasis. They remind the reader that the FL models are based on the cosmological principle, which has a philosophical rather than a physical status, since it cannot be directly tested by observation. In other words, observations alone do not uniquely select the FL models (see also [3], section 5.5, in this regard). Moreover the interpretation of cosmological observations depends on the choice of the underlying spacetime geometry. For example, there is ambiguity in inferring the spatial distribution of matter from redshift measurements. The authors discuss in some detail the work of Kurki-Suonio and Liang [5] to illustrate this point. They also refer to Celerier [1] who shows that the high redshift type Ia supernovae observations are compatible with a Lemaitre-Tolman model with zero cosmological constant, i.e. these observations do not imply that the universe is accelerating if one considers models more general than the FL models, in contrast to the usual interpretation.
The authors also give a critique of the cosmological inflation scenario, arguing that the problems that it aims to solve (the so-called horizon problem and the flatness problem) are a consequence of the very special geometry of the FL models. In particular, the flatness problem loses its urgency when one broadens the class of cosmological models, since the condition for flatness depends on spatial position. They also discuss in detail an analysis due to Celerier and Schneider [2] showing how the horizon problem can be resolved using a delayed big-bang singularity in a Lemaitre-Tolman cosmology (section 18.17).
We comment on two notable omissions as regards cosmology. First, the authors only refer in passing to the notion of the density parameter, which plays an important role in the analysis of the FL models, and which can also be introduced in more general models. Second, there is no discussion of perturbations of the FL models, although two related concepts, the density contrast and the curvature contrast, are analysed in the Lemaitre-Tolman models (section 18.19).
A second unusual feature is that there is a considerable emphasis on exact solutions, their derivation and physical interpretation. Derivations that are given in detail are for the spatially homogeneous solution of Bianchi type I with pressure-free matter, the Lemaitre-Tolman solutions, the Szekeres solutions and the Kerr solution (the original derivation using the Kerr-Schild metric, and Carter's derivation using separability of the Klein-Gordon equation). Readers may wish to compare the above-mentioned derivation of the Bianchi type I solutions, which uses metric components and coordinates, with the derivation given in [3] (see section 5.3), using the orthonormal frame formalism.
In summary, this book is an interesting and informative introduction to general relativity and cosmology. The unconventional choice of topics and emphasis may, however, lead some readers to conclude that it may be more suitable as a reference work than as the text for a course.
References
[1] Celerier M N 2000 Do we really see a cosmological constant in the supernovae data? Astron. Astrophys. 353 63 [2] Celerier M N and Schneider J 1998 A solution to the horizon problem: a delayed big bang singularity Phys. Lett. A 249 37 [3] Ellis G F R and van Elst H 1999 Cosmological models Theoretical and Observational Cosmology ed M Lachieze-Rey (Dordrecht: Kluwer) [4] Krasinski A 1997 Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [5] Kurki-Suonio H and Liang E 1992 Relation of redshift surveys to matter distribution in spherically symmetric dust Universes Astrophys. J. 390 5
No associations
LandOfFree
Book Review: does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Book Review:, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Book Review: will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1078602